I do not own the above image. Copyright Levrock Pictures. All rights reserved.
I have reached
the next level in my amateur film critic hobby-dom. A few weeks ago, I got an email from an
independent movie studio executive asking me to review his movie. When I could, I watched it with my wife. During the whole 82 minute runtime, I felt
conflicted. Conflicted about how the
professionals do this. How are they able
to write reviews of movies they are given?
How are they able to be truthful about a movie that they know the person
who sent you the movie WILL be reading their review? Are they able to really beat down a bad
movie? Is this something I have to learn
as I embark on this odyssey of film criticism?
Here goes nothing.
WILD GIRL WALTZ has the basics of being
a decent comedy. Two young women are
bored on a picturesque New England summer day.
They decide to each take a drug one of the women got from a
co-worker. They start tripping out. Their boyfriend/brother has to make sure they
survive. Surely this is going allow
hilarity to ensue? Not really.
I have a theory about movie
comedies. There is a realism spectrum
for comedies. On one end you have “100% realistic”
on the other is “100% absurdly ridiculous”.
To be a successful comedy, you should be close to either end of the
spectrum but not on the edge. Most Wes
Anderson movies are on the realistic end of the spectrum, while most other
modern successful comedies are on the ridiculous end. Right in the middle, you have Adam Sandler
movies and you know how those are. WILD GIRL WALTZ starts at around
65% absurd but moves closer to the center quickly.
Don’t get me wrong, I remember
laughing. After a (very) rough start,
there are 20 nice minutes where the three main characters do some interesting
things. I started writing this review
about 7 hours after it ended. I just don’t
remember one thing I laughed at.
I also don’t remember laughing at all
during the last 55 minutes. All I
remember is sitting on my futon, just like I am now, and have nothing to positively
react to. WGW is full of little scenes
that make little to no sense while they happen and look like terrible SNL skits
afterwards. An early scene deals with
the girls’ “babysitter” trying to collect a debt. The debt is never mentioned again. Another scene involves a woman being knocked
out for attempting to steal from the guy’s truck. Makes little sense and doesn’t advance the
plot. The movie also goes on a love
story tangent ala FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF.
It worked there, but doesn’t here.
But for those 20 glorious minutes,
the movie tries and somewhat succeeds. There
is plenty of potential here. This looks
more professional than most current blockbusters. The material & consistency just isn’t
there. WILD GIRL WALTZ just deflates
like a cheap beach ball. Then suffocates
you with its dullness.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment