Is there a more telling sign of a
mediocre movie than a weak main character?
Not just a weak main character, a meek main character. A character so weak & meek that the character’s
significant other has the big emotional scene, even if it is poorly written
& makes little sense. That movie is
TRUE STORY.
I do not own the above image. Copyright Plan B Productions & Fox Searchlight Pictures. All Right Reserved.
Michael Finkel (Hill) just got fired
from The New York Times for bending the truth on a cover story. He heads home to Montana where he lives with
his girlfriend Jill (Jones), hoping to revive his career. Eventually, a fellow journalist alerts him to
suspected murderer Christian Longo (Franco), who hid in Mexico under his
name. After one face-to-face meeting,
Finkel thinks he has his ticket back to relevancy.
TRUE STORY is about as bland as its
title. The movie plays like a cheap
version of CAPOTE. You have the
interactions between Finkel & Longo, where Franco outshines not only Hill
but also the dialogue between them. You
get the sense Franco has Longo down to a tee: somewhat intelligent, manipulative
with a sliver of implication that there is something hidden underneath. It is just a shame that we get nowhere down
that road.
The deep psychological elements of
the two leads are never explored in any meaningful way. For instance, in the letter Longo sends
Finkel, demonic drawings fill the opposite sides of many of the pages. But the deepest into them we get is a single
scene with Michael & Jill. Even then,
all Michael says is how odd it is that these drawings are similar to ones he
saw in Africa. Never is there a scene
where Michael & Christian talk about it.
I understand that Finkel isn’t a psychiatrist but why even have that
element in the movie if you are only going to wade into the kiddie pool instead
of jumping off the diving board.
And that’s not the only element of
the movie like that. For a long while, I
thought Hill was miscast. Eventually, I
woke up to the fact that Michael Finkel the movie lead character is plain old poorly
written. (spoiler alert?) There
are scenes where he interacts with the lead prosecutor on the case. For a while, he protects Longo like he is his
client or patient instead of the criminal he is. But once, Longo reveals he has been playing
with Michael all along, Finkel runs to the prosecutor like an informant, hoping
to stay relevant and save his work. It
is one thing for a character to assert himself in turning on someone close to
him but Finkel is written more in a groveling tone than a cooperative one. I half-expected Hill to be on his hands &
knees, begging for forgiveness. (end
spoiler alert)
The best thing I can say about TRUE
STORY is it kept my attention and the attention of the senior citizens in the
audience. This first feature by
director/co-writer Rupert Goold trudges along like a made-for-TV crime movie
that would have been on CBS on a random Saturday night in the summer of
1987. Franco is serviceable but the rest
does not live up to any major cinematic level.
Felicity Jones is given one scene to do anything of any consequence but
the scene is absurd and adds nothing but further irritation. Irritation that the movie half-assed a story
that could have been a little intriguing.
We learn nothing of consequence about these characters, these murders or
ourselves as a society. There is no
there there.
*1/2
What creeped me out was seeing at the end that the two of them still talk every month. Why?
ReplyDeleteI also remained bothered by the revelation they continue to converse once a month. Some psycho-logical codependency?
ReplyDeleteI also remained bothered by the revelation they continue to converse once a month. Some psycho-logical codependency?
ReplyDelete